The Hall-of-Fame & Wall-of-shame (interactive):
II. Insurance companies
III. Newspapers & Journalists
IV. Non-EUropean Ministries of Foreign affairs
Many other people were informed:
On the top of these there is a vast amount of accounts which totally ignored my calls to have a look at the data I have found and asked for help to examine, interpret, and ask questions.
Who does not know yet?
The public.
Who knows?
Almost everybody who must know. Some KNEW beforehand, I explored this and described the evidence. It was an issue of national security to know, would Russia retaliate? All intelligence and counterintelligence organizations dropped all work and focused on this one main security issue... Was the war starting? So yes, all knew and on 06 Oct 2022 EU heads jointly decided to keep the information off the public eyes.
Questions were asked:
I have created and sent a 101 pcs list of questions for journalists.
Is WaPo compromised?
The WaPo article is lacking sources for her extraordinary claim.
... against reaching premature conclusions on who was responsible for blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, suggesting the attack could also have been a ‘false flag’ operation to blame Ukraine
Mortymer´s investigation:
The "Nordstream affair" is a mission BY GOVERNMENT - SUSPECTS are politicians.
Here is the list of ALL SUSEPCTS:
All government officials of NATO states and some - here
The Nordstream mission was just the final hot part done by employees of the given government. They did their job. Do not blame them. Go after those government officials.
The story has two parts:
1. What politicians did
2. What happened in Baltic Sea
SUMMARY
My set of data based working hypothesis of events near Bornholm and elsewhere:
- My hypothesis, the set of data I collected, points to the UK as a single rogue actor - this post describes the data processing, this"the criminal profiling" and other aspects of the investigation.
- Plans were very long term, they can be traced to March 2021 and earlier.
- The main root-case was the Brexit and the situation the UK found itself in. Leaving the EU the UK lost all legal ways how to stop Nordstream. What was left was a direct or indirect kinetic hit.
- The UK government changed its strategies to align with the plan in which the Nordstream would be somehow cancelled. The mission started to take shape slowly, gradually.
- The UK government started to take a lead in anti-Nordstream motion exactly as announced in March 2021
- The UK tried to implement Global Britain policy but ultimately failed
- The UK started to prepare for the event contacting alternative suppliers before the event
- The UK started to prepare for the event warning own companies to pull out of Russia
- The UK started to prepare for the event warning an energy storm is coming
- The UK changed its security structures just a few days before the event
- A submarine was operating in the area already in spring 2022 collecting data
- The sub was detected by the USA and GER in June, even RU was looking into it
- The Baltops exercise could not be the time of explosives planting. Gazprom run yearly internal and external checks of pipelines after Baltops ended. Independent companies did it.
- The June CIA strategic warning was real, more details of the mission were known to the USA and NS Shareholders than what was shared with public. The dating for first part of September was likely to be known to be in first half of September as many exercises were planned for that period. [Makes sense that Hersh story is a deflection from September]
- Two legal battles over Nordstream (Unbounding and OutOfBankruptcy postponement for NS2) sealed the fate of Nordstream projects.
- Somehow USA knew it could happen but could not stop it. It did not agree with it and naturally could not openly say what UK plans were. The USA was against overdependency of its main European ally GER on NS2 but USA was not against NS1 [The NS1 was primary target].
- The UK sub enters Baltic Sea after BoJo visits Faslane at the end of August, mission is launched.
- There is a PM change in the UK BoJo -> Truss, and Queen dies. Truss re-signs the mission as PM. Her region is centered around the success of the mission.
- The mission got into delay due to high naval activity in the Baltic sea. Originally planting should happen on 14-15th (end of Northern coasts) - 22nd (Truss at the UN)
- Truss states at the UN that they are "cancelling power and pipelines of authoritative regimes" on 22nd September not knowing the planting was delayed. After NOR blew the whistle on 15-09-2022 and her UN speech the UK - USA experiences Special relationship split
- The Andromeda was a safety backup (with doctor) for sailors would the mission experience some unexpected change of plans, the plan was to be in the area around 15th of September.
- The mission was executed likely by RN S120 Ambush + Chalfont Bay + Mk11 (or similar)
- The submarine brought divers with the minisub to the northers location but due to NOR whistleblowing on 15 - 19 Sept it got delayed.
- Andromeda passed the Bornholm on 15th as agreed but could not stay not the area for too long.
- The USA informs its allies on 22-09-2022 that they have evaluated the situation and it is too hot for their own security, the nuclear exchange could not be ruled out, leaves Baltic Sea.
- SWE and later DK send into the area 2 ships, the prime target (two lines of NS1) are mined, the perpetrator is disturbed, SWE and DK get hydroacoustic record of the sub/minisub. One
-
No comments:
Post a Comment