About the Theory and Practical aspects of investigation
Crime scene reconstruction is the process of determining the sequence of events about what happened before, during, and after a crime.
Crime scenes can be reconstructed through the study and interpretation of scene models and patterns, as well as the examination of data, and different types of evidence.
There are 5 steps in crime reconstruction:
1. Data collection
2. Conjecture
3. Hypothesis formulation
4. Testing
5. Theory formation
The Mortymer Hypothesis is a massive archive of carefully curated crime related data, all of which has been lawfully obtained only from the public domain. All sources are properly linked and dated.
There may be another hypothesis that explains the data differently, but the author points to vast amount of different types of cross-referencing and supporting evidence (circumstantial, documentary, video, audio, photographic, electronic, digital, demonstrative, character, photographic, confession, implied,..) which put together it paints a highly likely scenario in which elements of the British government went rogue, planned, prepared and launched an attack against Nordstream pipelines.
This attack is a part of other policies - energy, security, geopolitics. Then there is the matter of the concealment by top politicians who helped to cover up the read identity of the perpetrator for public.
This hypothesis has been consistent since October 2022 after the author found first possible evidence pointing to London.
Q&A:
Q: Is this investigation accurate and reliable?
A: Best investigative practices have been followed as much as possible.
Q: Is it exhaustive?
A: No. There is definitely another set of data inaccessible to the author.
Q: Were another hypothesis tested?
A: Yes. All possible suspected governments are listed here
Base scenario included all possible governments.
There are another sections dedicated to different suspects.
There were several rounds of elimination, earliest elimination here.
Q: What is the like-hood that the prime suspect used a proxy?
A: The exact type of approach/escape and description of detailed steps on how the crime was done is up to investigators. This investigation focuses on the government officials which are main culprits, not the navy team which was tasked to conduct the mission.
While majority of conspiracy theories are focused on the area east of Bornhom island this investigation looks into evidence which is connected to governments.
Q: Is there any hard admissible undeniable evidence?
A: Between the vast data there are several key statements and events, data, which could be considered as such. These need further investigation and validation which belong to investigator´s responsibility.
There is also large amount of cross-referenced supportive evidence.
Q: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Is there any "smoking gun"?
A: Again, this investigation does not rely on one single evidence where the perpetrator is seen planting explosives blowing pipelines. The amount of evidence required in a criminal case to reach a satisfactory conclusion is determined by the legal standards of proof.
Q: What does this mean?
A: The burden of proof lies with the prosecution in criminal cases. It will be seen how this investigation is defined, if it is: Clear and Convincing Evidence, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt, Preponderance of the Evidence, Expert Evidence or else.
Q: So, how was the data collected? Is it reliable?
A: Yes. Slowly and thoroughly, through newspaper, official documents, policies, strategies, targeted searches. Freely available data extraction tools were used to go through vast amount of data.
Q: How so the media is not picking about this investigation?
A: Hard to say. The hypothesis opens highly sensitive international relations "can of worms" in which one NATO state attacked European Key Energy Infrastructure of the whole Europe. Media consult with governments what could be in this case published.
Q: Will any of investigations reveal who has done it?
A: I can only speculate, but broadly Yes. I believe in justice. Too much money is involved and too many people are "in the know". The data I have collected shows that the identity of the perpetrator is well known and was even known before the event to very limited few politicians. People leak. This scandal is too big to be contained.
Q: There is so much on your blog to read. Where to start?
A: Depending what you want. The recent post "Sikorski moment" opens well the political positioning around the September 2022.
Crime scene reconstruction plays a crucial role in providing insights into criminal cases, helping investigators and legal professionals understand how events unfold and assisting with crime scene reconstruction. Support the pursuit of justice.
There are many posts on X/Twitter dedicated to the case e.g. here, here,...
One can see my dedication to the case by query: "Mortymer001 Nordstream"
***
There is an ongoing progress in
"The crime sequence reconstruction"
it is understood that
It will be a long one, this case is very complex.
New data are added, researched, analysed.
The Crime Sequence of what happened and how
is a "work in progress".
Several threads have been posted on X/Twitter
and attached to the pinned tweet:
***
Crime is crime
and it doesn't matter who did it,
the identity must be revealed,
it's justice or another crime.
***
RELATED POSTS:
***
***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.
Every bit helps keep this mission alive!
(retweet and follow)
