Showing posts with label _MISC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label _MISC. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

207 - Progress report

Hello,

This blog post serves as a progress report
on an ongoing ONLY PUBLIC OPEN investigation
into the Nord Stream pipeline explosions.

It summarizes the findings,
outlines planned publications,
and addresses various competing theories.

It tells a story how it evolved in over 200 posts.

In reaction to Peacemaker, 
@peacemaket71
 - post with a summary

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

The investigation into the Nord Stream pipeline explosions has successfully debunked all competing theories that point fingers at Russia, USA, Ukraine, or Norway and offers unique perspective. All data is legal.

The investigation follows best criminal investigation practices.

It started 2 years ago just after the event happened has runs open for all to read, check and verify. The author is an independent data researcher and is not aligned to any party nor is he anyhow connected to any organization. He is just for personal reason determined to solve the case.

Key findings are corroborated by Swedish investigator Mats Ljungqvist and benchmarked against Russian and non-Russian official statements. Conclusions of this investigation are consistent with all those statements and other data. The hypothesis has been properly tested and exhaustive list of alternative takes were exercised. There has not been found any internal nor external contradiction which could not be explain with the use of available data.

So far body has been able to bring any issues with this hypothesis. As part of verification and validation I keep challenging people to look and find issues. This hypothesis has highest confidence and people of various background have been surprised about the depth on insights it offers and very logical explanations of how things unfolded.     

A substantial dataset of evidence is being utilized, available for patrons on Patreon

Upcoming publications will highlight non-Russian claims by prominent figures (done) and examine the roles of the US and UK in these events (ongoing). There are about 50 other posts in the pipeline. 

The investigation went through common steps of investigation including data collection, profiling, theory formations, data analyses, alt. theories testing, benchmarking, etc. Not all steps are uploaded due to time restrains - just the directional progress through sharing partial information about different aspects of the crime. The case is very complex. To fully understand and comprehend the whole plot a large amount of information needed to be processed. A lot of research has been done offline. 

The investigation has reached its conclusion, with a final report on the way. For now, you can, for example look at this post on X/Twitter here or here or in key-takeaways here.

During the last two years the focus has been on the research and investigation itself, the form of the publication through blog with little edits and explanations was to showcase the progress. 

Last month has been spent on improvements of readability, summaries, and other edits so readers can learn about events surrounding the crime.Naturally I sent several posts to people to look at.

I decided to open the investigation with NO paywall at the very beginning because I have no reach, nor resources to promote. I tried to contact major newspapers but nobody, so far, has taken the notice, just Nordic Times once here.

My hope is that independent international investigation will be launched. That people will start to ask question and demand answers based on the data/evidence I have uncovered.

I have my concerns because the European leadership is compromised. They knew and they decided to keep it a well guarded secret. Now it is a mess.

Only real verifiable data can untangle what really happened.

I have solved the case. 

What is happening right now with the investigation?


Main draft posts right now:
- Summary of non-Russian VIP claims (done)
- "The Anatomy of Nordstream Affair" (ongoing)
- "The team of Biden, Blinken, Sullivan and Austin in the Nordstream Affair" 
- "The UK and Norway relationship before and after Nordstream affair"
- "The US Navy preparations for the international crisis"
- "Movements of navy ships to/from UK ports"
- "Movements of NATO navies after Nordstream affair"
- USA deployment of diplomacy before the Nordstream affair
- Managing the Nordstream affair - diplomatic channels 

Competing hypothesis:
- Hersh´s unverifiable insider claim (debunked)
- Ukraine and Andromeda ship (debunked)
- Norwegians (debunked)
- Russia did it (debunked)

Confirmed by:
- Mats Ljungqvist the Swedish investigator (link)
- Consistency of Russian claims (link)
- Other VIP statements (draft)

Investigation based on: 
- Largest data-source/evidence (uploaded to Patreon)
- Downloadable large Master data-set split to 15 files of "Nordstream Files"

Working on:
- Creating presence on BuyMeACoffee platform
- Supporters will get access to unpublished insights (here)
- Members will get  access to additional evidence (here)
- Free overview Posts-Carousell-Art (here)


The author is seeking support via BuyMeACoffee to continue the research efforts,
after 2 years of self financing it solely from savings (over €50.000 so far)

"Those who caused the Nordstream affair 
were also behind the end of my IT nearshoring consultancy business.
(That cost is immeasurable and no compensation was ever possible).
Knowing my expert skills with data mining, data analysis 
I decided to solve the case no matter the cost.
The country which did this must be brought to the court!
Crime is a crime!"
M.

Supporters will find links to complimentary overview posts 
and additional yet unpublished evidence,
in "Exclusive content" and "Members only" channels. 
Support me and chat with me online.

RELATED POSTS:





***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)

Monday, November 4, 2024

206 - Nordstream Files uploaded to Patreon

 

The Data - The Evidence

How it happened Timeline

The Resource files

Nordstream_Files

...was polished, uploaded and is now available:


SUMMARY:

A researcher known as Mortymer001 has released an extensive investigation into the Nord Stream incident. Key data files are available for purchase on Patreon, while a free blog offers ongoing updates and analyses. The mini blogging platform BuyMeACoffee offers Exclusive content. 

KEY TAKEAWAYS:

A comprehensive collection of Nord Stream data files ("Nordstream Files") has been uploaded to PatreonThe dataset features legal documents, a timeline of events, and other pertinent evidence on downloadable pdf files. The total character count of the data is quite substantial, exceeding 966,600 characters.

The investigation incurred costs of approximately €50,000 for the researcher. While the blog provides free access to the analytical research which has been conducted online for all information to be available to readers, the core data remains behind a paywallFor inquiries about republishing the data, contact details are provided in the researcher's X/Twitter bio or through secure Wire app. Additional support for the research can be offered through the BuyMeaCoffee platform. Selected Exclusive content could be found on BuyMeACoffee platform, supporters and members get access to exclusive insights, evidence and data not published elsewhere.




Check it out!

Data Files overview + size:



Approximate total Size:
Just to keep in mind, the average one spaced page 
usually contains about 3000 characters or 500 words.

(All Legal data)

Note: This investigation on this blog is fully free. It costed me about 50 000 €.
So enjoy the free part and do not complain that the main data-file is paid.
For re-publishing my data you can contact me via secure Wire - see my X/Twitter bio.



RELATED POST:




***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)

Friday, October 25, 2024

201 posts of Mortymer´s Nordstream hypothesis

2023 + 2024 recap

TWO YEARS OF INVESTIGATION:

2024 Posts grouped based on topics:

GAZPROM - NORD STREAM RELATED
RUSSIAN STATEMENTS
NON-RUSSIAN STATEMENTS
USA STATEMENTS
JEF
NATO RELATED
EU RELATED
UN RELATED
UK RELATED
POSEIDON P-8A RELATED
HYBRID ATTACKS PREOPS
GER NAVY RELATED
US NAVY RELATED
INSURANCE
GEOPOLITICS - MACKINDER ROADBLOCK HYPOTHESIS
REAL JOURNALISM

2023 Posts:

THE USA-GER  NORDSTREAM POLITICS
How the Nordstream 2 did not got its certification
Was the Nordstream 2 used as an energy weapon?
About the GER-USA Nordstream 2 AG deal
Data show Biden has not ordered Nordstream destruction

THE USA-UK NORDSTREAM POLITICS
About the UK-USA "special relationship"

"MISSION NORDSTREAM", SUBMARINES related
Whose submarine visited Bornholm Deep before the Nordstream was blown up?
The UK chain of command toward SBS

BRITAIN´S NOT JUST HARSH RETHORICS
Mission accomplished - UK - from Energy Importer to Energy Exporter

The Nordstream affair, West Red herrings and Mats Ljungqvist - the SWE investigator - PART 1
The Nordstream affair, East Red herrings and Mats Ljungqvist - the SWE investigator - PART 2
Red herrings in the east, red herrings in the west, red herrings everywhere - PART 3

LIST OF STATES AS SUSPECTS:
Russian Motives to blow Nordstream pipelines
Norway energy exports to EU were at the limit. Why to blow Nordstream then?


OWN INVESTIGATIONS related (other)

ORIGINAL EARLY POSTS




There are now 200 Nordstream affair related investigative posts
I do not care about quantity
The quality is important

I do not write for public (for easy consumption)
I run my investigation OPEN
For all to see, to have the ability to look at data
For public to make their OWN opinion

Use your reading comprehension!
Use your critical thinking!
Ask questions.


***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)

Thursday, December 21, 2023

121 - Hersh´s claim vs Hard data - and - Mortymer´s Nordstream hypothesis recap


Just read and see...

This post compares Seymour Hersh´s claim to my data-set.
Each his main point is debunked or explained.

The 2nd part sorts my investigation into logical groups.
The master data sheet will not be publicly available.
Researchers and journalists can request private access (on Patreon).
For contacting me use my twitter account (see bio).

(AS ALWAYS: Simple graphics,
all data is properly dates with links to sources
red - important, blue - own input)


The core of the Hersh´s claim is:

  1. Biden´s administration has planned how to take down Nordstream pipelines very early in 2022
  2. Biden himself admitted they will take them down if Russia enters Ukraine
  3. Explosives were planted during NATO´s Baltops naval exercise
  4. Guilty is the Kaersarge group with Norweigean minehunters 
  5. Norway was active participant
  6. US Poseidon 8 plane dropped a buoy which remotely triggered charges
  7. Nuland and her pile of rusting junk metal statement  

EACH single point commented:

  1. Biden´s administration has planned how to take down Nordstream pipelines very early in 2022
    -> This data-set does not support such finding AND no such data to support this were found.
    -> There is no evidence of political positioning of USA for it to execute the mission, actually the opposite. The USA, after the 19-09-2022 tried to de-escalate the crisis to prevent war - here.
    -> The USA closed in 2021 "Merkel´s deal" that if Russia enters Ukraine the NS2 will not be certified - here and here
    -> The UK, after Brexit, lost all legal ways how to stop Russian energy expansion - here
    -> The UK was voicing very much for EU to stop course of its energy policy - here
    -> There is no evidence of USA other naval forces getting into position would the crisis get out of hand, the USA actually left Baltic sea on 21-22-09-2022 due to risk to its own security - here
    -> This data set shows that the USA was actually supporting Germany in protecting pipelines since Baltops exercises - here
    -> The USA actually found out about the danger to Nordstream and warned its allies in June,
    The release of this news was 27-09-2022 as a part of PR after the USA left Baltic sea - here
    ->The ONLY data I found about US divers was here - US-UK training mission in Florida

  2. Biden himself admitted they will take them down, unspecified answer how
    -> Biden spoke ONLY about Nordstream 2, the prime target was the NS1: video here
    -> Listen carefully, he describes the Merkel´s deal he just re-signed with GER new chancellor Scholz. He clearly states the condition "IF Russia does X then..." which means that NS2 will not get the certification and that is what happened, both countries kept their promise - here.
    -> This investigation shows that Biden and Scholz were re-signing Merkel´s deal herehere
    -> Biden originally allowed NS2 in June 2021, for USA it is not an issue of national security but is for the UK as many time stated here and here.
    -> Note that USA understood well that GER needs energy diversification and was ok with NS1 but was against over-reliance of its key ally on Russia - here
    -> Compare this with what was the official narrative of the UK and specially Truss narrative here


  3. Explosives were planted during NATO´s Baltops naval exercise
    -> This claim looks very odd. The remote trigger by passing plane by dropping a sono-buoy with the timer to be still postponed allowing deniability? Yet planes have trackers - here.
    -> The more complex the operation is the higher risk something could go wrong.
    -> Several experts e.g. FRA navy deep diver, or DK navy experts point to sub-surface approach - here and here.

    -> This investigation has found a evidence of several states having hydro-acoustic data about submarine/mini-submarine/large submersible-drone operating in the area from 19-25 September. 
    -> All September naval exercises included anti-submarine part, there were several ASW helicopters staying long in the area flying in paths resembling anti-submarine operation.
    -> It is possible that the claim has been created in order to allow explanation of possible sono-buoy if found. Exercises: POL+POR, GER+LIT+FRA+FIN, SWE.
    -> The mission to attack Nordstream was highly complex in contested area under constant surveillance of several states, surface approach would be very risky - here
    -> Large navies do have very high-end capabilities and well trained deep divers who are accustomed to work under stress. They exercise different options, e.g. being left on the open sea. There is no point to use low tech on high end target in nofailure-allowed type of mission here
    -> The closer to the 26-09-2022 the better chance of concealment - here
    -> The longer time from the 26-09-2022 the higher risk of discovery - here
    -> The window of opportunity is from 17 July 2022 when Nordstream run internal (pigging) and external (visual) checks due to yearly maintenance. It is done by 3rd independent parties and is required for re-insurance. Explosives/charges could be found 


  4. Guilty is the Kaersarge group with Norweigean minehunters 
    -> Norway was not the country to blame but the country which found out the UK´s plan - here.
    -> Norway (PM Støre and Defence minister Gram) actually warned both USA and its EU allies. The USA informed France and Germany that the area is unsafe for them and that they need to takeover the security of the pipeline the USA was anyway against - here
    -> As a result of Russian nuclear positioning - here and snap Russian anti submarine exercise - here - was conducted near future blast. 


    -> Is the USA culpable? My data-set does not support such data but this investigation shows that it was the UK who planned and executed the mission. The USA left the Baltic sea and started to de-escalate worrying that the crisis could  grow into next European war and possibly in the worse case scenario even a nuclear exchange.


  5. Norway was active participant and wanted to gain large profit

    -> Norway was actually announcing willingness to lower energy exports and domestic prices were too high, their largest customer is the UK whose competitiveness could be effected - here
    -> Norway actually blew a whistle on 19-09-2022 as their security seemed to learn the plans of Truss government - here
    -> Here are more details about the NOR not trusting NATO security and signing separate bilateral defence treaty with the USA just before the Nordstream is hit - here


  6. US Poseidon 8 plane dropped a buoy which remotely triggered charges
    -> This data based investigation is elegantly able to explain the Poseidon P-8 flight from Iceland - here
    -> The USA after finding out about the impending UK´s rogue attack on Nordstream (and perhaps other diversions) was feeling insecure and closed direct bileteral defence agreement just before the Nordstream happened - here. The USA started to feel also uneasy and the crisis as deepening. Putin and his advisors made statements that Russia will protect its territory with weapons. Gazprom is 51% owned by Russian state and Nordstream 2 AG is a doughter company fully owned by Gazprom, incorporated in Switzerland. 
    -> This data based investigation is elegantly able to explain Sikorski moment - here

  7. Nuland and her pile of rusting junk metal at the bottom of the sea statement
    -> The USA acted opportunistically - UK had a diplomatic mission to USA shortly before, during and after the mission. First on unofficial level, then on deeper - meetings were held.
    -> It is unclear how and when exactly the UK informed USA or whether the USA asked the UK about their plans. The special relationship pause hints to USA not agreeing first with the mission.
    -> There was a political split between the US-UK governments and the "special relationship" was even put to pause until it is clarified what was going.
    -> Data point that UK officials arrived to Norfolk on 20-09-2022 one day after NOR warning.
    -> More research is necessary to find out who knew what and how things were managed.
SUMMARY:


This investigation runs from 27-09-2022  
 In early October 2022 I realized a UK submarine S-120 Ambush 
just returned to its home port Faslane in Scotland. 
It was visited by a UK Defense Minister, 
He visited submariners in the sub, not in some meeting room. 
  

I asked  DoD shortly after:
 
I made a brief about the Nordstream listing known facts 
It included a thesis that the UK was the only country 
which could be culpable of the deed:
Like many discussed ad nauseum, my claim had head and heels. 
People like the data I found and shared, wanted more. So I started the blog. 
In January 2023 a friend asked me to contact investigative journalists. 
After appeal by another one I did contacted Larrisa Ward. 
This was before Hersh came with his story.


MORTYMER´S NORDSTREAM HYPOTHESIS

THE DATA - THE EVIDENCE


THE USA-GER  NORDSTREAM POLITICS
How the Nordstream 2 did not got its certification
Was the Nordstream 2 used as an energy weapon?
About the GER-USA Nordstream 2 AG deal
Data show Biden has not ordered Nordstream destruction

THE USA-UK NORDSTREAM POLITICS
About the UK-USA "special relationship"

"MISSION NORDSTREAM", SUBMARINES related
Whose submarine visited Bornholm Deep before the Nordstream was blown up?
The UK chain of command toward SBS

BRITAIN´S NOT JUST HARSH RETHORICS
Mission accomplished - UK - from Energy Importer to Energy Exporter

The Nordstream affair, West Red herrings and Mats Ljungqvist - the SWE investigator - PART 1
The Nordstream affair, East Red herrings and Mats Ljungqvist - the SWE investigator - PART 2
Red herrings in the east, red herrings in the west, red herrings everywhere - PART 3

LIST OF STATES AS SUSPECTS:
Russian Motives to blow Nordstream pipelines
Norway energy exports to EU were at the limit. Why to blow Nordstream then?


OWN INVESTIGATIONS related (other)

ORIGINAL EARLY POSTS


Closing remarks: Here are some Q and A about my investigation.

APPEAL TO JOURNALISTS  INVESTIGATE!
ASK POLITICIANS QUESTIONS! 
IS MY HYPOTHESIS CORRECT?
OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION MUST BE OPEN TO PUBLIC!!!

***
Crime is crime
and it doesn't matter who did it,
the identity must be revealed,
it's justice or another crime.


***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)