Thursday, May 18, 2023

050 - Data show Biden has not ordered Nordstream destruction

PREFACE/ISSUE

This post explores why USA is actually not my prime suspect for the Nordstream AG and Nordstream 2 AG destruction but it seems to be involved in the cover-up crime. [Spoiler, prime suspect here]


-> Lets look into the claim that Biden ordered Nordstream destruction

-> and that it was done during Baltops naval exercise

This post has several parts:
    1. Merkel´s deal reaffirmed by Scholz
    2. Biden´s statement that (only) Nordstream 2 AG will be stopped 
    3. Scholz reaffirmed the deal about Nordstream 2 AG
    4. Baltops vs Yearly Maintenance
    5. Baltops
    6. Scandinavian report
    7. The USA warns Nordstream shareholders
    8. Russia protects its pipelines
    9. Kaersarge group leaves and later returns to Baltic Sea
    10. Nordstream 2 AG wins two important court cases
    11. Kaersarge Group exercises with Sweden and catches a submarine
    12. German Northern Shores naval exercise
    13. Swedish and Danish Navies find a submarine
    14. Russia is rushing to the place
    15. Truss UN announcement
    16. The US-UK meetings and warnings to EUropeans
    17. Kaersarge leaves Baltic Sea
    18. Protests in Lubin on 25-09-2022

The over -reliance vs Full stop of RU gas exports

25 Aug 2016 - Biden warns EU against Russian gas dependency

US Vice President Joe Biden warned European countries against becoming too dependent on Russian oil and gas, saying it would be "bad" for Europe.

[M: Biden and US government message was very consistent from early on, several examples of statements and warnings against over-dependency on Russian energy. He was never against stopping all RU exports to EU.]


I. The Merkel´s deal about Nordstream 2 AG

6 June 2021 - Exclusive: Zelensky "surprised" and "disappointed" by Biden pipeline move

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says he learned through the press — not any direct heads-up — that President Biden had decided to stop trying to block a Russian pipeline that Ukraine sees as a dire national security threat.

Driving the news: Zelensky used an hourlong Zoom interview with Axios on Friday to beseech Biden to meet with him face to face before a June 16 summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin — offering to join him "at any moment and at any spot on the planet."

The embattled leader spoke of Putin's psychological pressure campaign; his own anger-turned-disappointment at the U.S.; and his hope that Biden, whom he compares to basketball great Michael Jordan, can still outmaneuver Russia and rescue Ukraine.   

[M: A must read article describing the US - GER - UA views]  

23 June 2021 - Blinken Warns That Nord Stream 2 Could Be 'Coercivie Tool' Against Europe


Blinken said he and Maas agreed that concrete steps are needed to "ensure that Russia cannot use energy as a coercive tool directed at Ukraine or anyone else in Europe."

The United States continues to believe that the pipeline is "ultimately a Russian geopolitical project that threatens European energy security and potentially undermines the security of Ukraine and other countries in the region," Blinken said at a news conference after meeting Maas. 

[M: Note that always the topic is NS2, not whole lot of Russian piped gas.] 

July 2021 - European ParliamentThe Nord Stream 2 pipeline - Economic, environmental and geopolitical issues   

US sanctions attempt to halt the pipeline 

[M: This paper is a must read] 

13 July 2021 - Merkel reassures Ukraine on Nord Stream 2 ahead of talks with U.S. President Biden 

Outgoing Chancellor Angela Merkel has reassured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy that Germany would do everything to ensure Ukraine remains a gas transit state even after the completion of the contentious Nord Stream 2 pipeline. She will travel to Washington, D.C., this week to find a “common position” on the project in talks with President Joe Biden, said the chancellor. The pipeline is 98 percent complete and scheduled to start operation this year, Nord Stream 2 AG CEO Matthias Warnig told Handelsblatt. 

“We will do everything we can to make it very clear that Nord Stream 2 is not a substitute for the promised transit deliveries through Ukraine,” said Merkel alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in Berlin.  

In an attempt to revive the transatlantic relationship and show goodwill, the U.S. has recently decided not to impose sanctions against the German company behind the gas pipeline, Nord Stream 2 AG, and its CEO Matthias Warnig. Merkel and Biden also briefly talked about the project on the sidelines of the G7 summit in the UK. However, there is bi-partisan opposition in the U.S. Congress, which could hinder a deal between the two countries. 

21 July 2021 - Joint Statement of the United States and Germany on Support for Ukraine, European Energy Security, and our Climate Goals

We support the energy security of Ukraine and Central and Eastern Europe, including the key principles enshrined in the EU’s Third Energy Package of diversity and security of supply. Germany underscores that it will abide by both the letter and the spirit of the Third Energy Package with respect to Nord Stream 2 under German jurisdiction to ensure unbundling and third-party access. This includes an assessment of any risks posed by certification of the project operator to the security of energy supply of the EU.

22 July 2021 - Ukraine gets compensation in exchange for US-Germany deal on Nord Stream 2

Following the agreement between Germany and the US over the contentious Nord Stream 2 pipeline, Ukraine may just become a major hydrogen exporter. 

22 July 2021 - Joint Statement of the US and Germany on Support for Ukraine, European Energy Security, and our Climate Goals 

..., to ensure the United States and the EU remain prepared, including with appropriate tools and mechanisms, to respond together to Russian aggression and malign activities, including Russian efforts to use energy as a weapon. Should Russia attempt to use energy as a weapon or commit further aggressive acts against Ukraine, Germany will take action at the national level and press for effective measures at the European level, including sanctions, to limit Russian export capabilities to Europe in the energy sector, including gas, and/or in other economically relevant sectors. This commitment is designed to ensure that Russia will not misuse any pipeline, including Nord Stream 2, to achieve aggressive political ends by using energy as a weapon. 

We support the energy security of Ukraine and Central and Eastern Europe, including the key principles enshrined in the EU’s Third Energy Package of diversity and security of supply. Germany underscores that it will abide by both the letter and the spirit of the Third Energy Package with respect to Nord Stream 2 under German jurisdiction to ensure unbundling and third-party access. This includes an assessment of any risks posed by certification of the project operator to the security of energy supply of the EU.

The United States and Germany are united in their belief that it is in Ukraine’s and Europe’s interest for gas transit via Ukraine to continue beyond 2024. In line with this belief, Germany commits to utilize all available leverage to facilitate an extension of up to 10 years to Ukraine’s gas Transit agreement with Russia, including appointing a special envoy to support those negotiations, to begin as soon as possible and no later than September 1. The United States commits to fully support these efforts. 

Germany and the United States will endeavor to promote and support investments of at least $1 billion in the Green Fund for Ukraine, including from third parties such as private-sector entities. Germany will provide an initial donation to the fund of at least $175 million and will work toward extending its commitments in the coming budget years.  

22 August 2021 - Nord Stream 2 'dangerous geopolitical weapon': Zelensky

Kiev sees the soon-to-be completed Nord Stream 2 pipeline carrying Russian gas to Europe and bypassing Ukraine as "a dangerous geopolitical weapon", President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday.

The Ukrainian leader was speaking at a joint press conference in Kiev with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has spearheaded the pipeline fiercely opposed by Russian neighbours Ukraine, Poland and the Baltic states.

The $12-billion pipeline beneath the Baltic Sea is set to double Russian natural gas shipments to Germany, Europe's largest economy. It avoids Ukraine, depriving Kiev of essential gas transit fees.

[M: Yearly transit fees are around € 2 Billion] 

Merkel said the Germany-US agreement specifies "sanctions" if gas is "used as a weapon".   

12 Dec 2021 - Dec 12, 2021 - Berlin warns no green light for Nord Stream 2 pipeline in Ukraine 'escalation'

The Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia will not be allowed to operate in the event of any new "escalation" in Ukraine, under an agreement between Berlin and Washington, Germany's new Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said on Sunday.

[M: Note the deal is about NS2, the US previously acknowledged NS1 is OK due to long term deals and Germany needing gas imports for industry. The energy security issue both Trump and Biden spoke about was the over-reliance on one exporter] 

Always only about Nordstream 2 

Fast forward:

8 June 2022 Angela Merkel in the interview:

"But it wasn't an easy decision. "The thesis at the time was that once Nord Stream 2 is operational, Putin will stop supplying gas through Ukraine or even attack it." The West ensured that gas was routed through Ukraine anyway, and she continued to receive transit fees. Merkel pointed out that Russia then attacked Ukraine on February 24, when gas was not yet routed through Nord Stream 2 . "In this sense, gas was not a weapon," Merkel said." 


II. Biden says he will end Nordstream 2 AG
 

09 Feb 2022 - Biden says he'll shut down Nord Stream 2 pipeline if Russia further invades Ukraine 


"If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2," 
Biden said. "We will bring an end to it."

Asked how the U.S. would ensure that, Biden did not offer specifics: 
"I promise you: We will be able to do it." It's a point Biden administration officials have stressed in recent weeks.

10 Feb 2022 - Biden says the Nord Stream 2 pipeline won't move ahead if Russia invades Ukraine

President Biden and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said during a joint news conference on Monday that they are in complete agreement on sanctions against Moscow if diplomacy fails and Russia invades Ukraine again.

That includes working together to stop the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline — a multibillion-dollar vein that runs from Russia to Germany.
The pipeline is not yet operational but has emerged as a key issue in the standoff. 

[M: See the problem? Biden and US never spoke about Nordstream AG, only about  Nordstream 2 AG; Since Trump the USA was against the over-reliance (see video) of its ally on Russian gas. Compare this to statements of UK about the same topic in this same timeframe - data collected here 

23 Feb 2022 - US imposes further sanctions on Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, Russia calls them ‘illegal’

 

III. Scholz Reaffirms the Merkel´s deal

22 Feb 2022 - Merkel´s deal reaffirmed

Two days before Russia's invasion, chancellor Olaf Scholz announced he had ordered the economy ministry to withdraw a supply security report, which is an essential element for certification, effectively putting the process on hold. This came as a reaction to Russia's president Vladimir Putin officially recognising two breakaway regions of eastern Ukraine.

[M: See? Both USA and Germany honoured the deal and had no more issues about Russian NS1. Meanwhile the uK was pushing for more - see here.] 


IV. Baltops vs Yearly maintennance of pipelines


05 July - 17 July 2022 NATO BALTOPS exercise 

[M: It takes about 10 days to run the pigging tool through the pipeline. It is inconceivable and risky that explosions would be planted before that date. Collected data include magnetic anomalies and other irregularities which could hint to explosives.]

[M: There is a risk that the internal and external checks would reveal planted charges. External checks described here]

[M: This hints to the window of opportunity for planting explosives between the 21 July 2022 and 25th of September 2022. Movement of ships within 10 nautical miles of future blasts- here by 
Erik Andersson
]

[M: Note that the shorter the time before the event the smaller the chance of premature exposure.]

[M: The timing kind of disqualifies BALTOPS for being the timeframe when explosives were planted - post here]

V. NATO Baltops naval exercise

4 June 2022 - Germany purchases 7 additional Boeing P-8A Poseidon and buries MAWS project, to complete a fleet of 12 Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA).

[M: Germany sees vulnerable in maritime area, why? did some recent demonstration show lack of performance vs proof of capabilities of P8 so GER decided for the switch?] 

8 June 2022 - US and GER military planes conducted activity over future Nordstream attack site. The Boeing P-8A simply switched off its call signseveral rounds over the NS blast site. 

[M: Was there a submarine detected?] 

14 June 2022 - BALTOPS 22: A Perfect Opportunity for Research and Resting New Technology

Experimentation was conducted off the coast of Bornholm, Denmark, with participants from Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Newport, and Mine Warfare Readiness and Effectiveness Measuring all under the direction of U.S. 6th Fleet Task Force 68. 

 

15 June 2022 - Royal Navy divers from Portsmouth undertake ‘importance’ explosives clearance using state-of-the-art drones in Lithuania  

June 15 2022 - Experimentation on new types of unmanned...

...underwater vehicles were also tested off the coast of Bornholm Island, Denmark during the exercise.

VI. The "Scandinavia exposee" - 

The new spin story is that Russia has been near future blasts on the 14th of July during the Baltops exercise. What happened there? 

   [M: Let me copy-paste excellent comment by Erik Andersson...]


The RU ship turned on 14th at 18:00 back and went back toward the future blast.


[M: Russia has active and passive protection of pipelines plus radars in Kaliningrad]

[M: Details about Bornholm Deep basin and suitability for submarine operation is described here.]

[M: The Scandinavian documentary actually does not say anything new. All data about ships were already known. They are just confirmed by satellite data and they match. AIS data are freely available here.] 


VII. The strategic CIA warning in June 2022

June 2022: Der Spiegel was the first to report that the The C.I.A... 

...issued a vague warning in June to a number of European nations, including Germany, that the two Nord Stream gas pipelines that carry natural gas from Russia could be targeted in forthcoming attacks, three senior officials familiar with the intelligence said on Tuesday...

... what intelligence officials call “strategic warning” of a possible attack — a warning that came with no specifics about the likely time or place or manner of a potential strike... The Biden administration, which in the run-up to the war often accused Russia of planning attacks on Ukraine, was careful on Tuesday not to blame Moscow — or anyone else. 

[M: It is unknown when exactly in June this strategic warning happened. Was it before the Baltops? Did US got some information during Baltops? Or after?] 

[M: The USA was not against the Nordstream AG only against the over-reliance on RU energy and Nordstream 2 pipeline. The "Merkel/Schloz-Biden deal" was agreed and the USA had no reason to push forward against the Nordstream 1 pipelines. The USA stated that Germany´s energy security depends on Russian gas. The Germany has ongoing deal until 2030 to purchase Russian gas at set price.]

 

VIII. Russia can not patrol Nordstream in Territorial waters.


In May 2022 Boris Johnson received very odd Twitter tweet,
it stated the vulnerability of NS in terms of location
and legal issues due to its HQ/incorporation in Switzerland.

See 
16 June 2022 - Russia once again intrudes into Danish territory

This time a warship entered Danish waters near Bornholm while thousands attend Folkemødet political festival on the island

16 June2022 - Russian Ambassador Summoned Following Violation of Danish Airspace: “Inacceptable breach”

The summons is a reaction to Russia’s violation of Danish airspace on 11 June between 11:08 a.m. and 11:42 a.m., during which time two Russian SU-30 fighter planes were observed over Danish airspace near Christiansø Island and Bornholm Island. 

17 June 2022 - Russian warship violated Danish territorial waters in Baltic, Danish military says

[M: How strange that in such a short time Russia violated 3x with different means Danish Territorial Zone? As for military ships they are allowed free passage but they must not conduct military operations. So, were Russian assets - plane and ships conducting some anti--submarine searches?]

[M: Whose submarine visited Bornholm Deep before the Nordstream was blown up?]

 

IX. The USS Kaersarge group left Baltic Sea and then returns

3 August 2022 - Kearsarge ARG, 22nd MEU return to the Baltic Sea

Elements of the ARG-MEU include flagship Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3), San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock ship USS Arlington (LPD 24), and Whidbey Island-class dock landing ship USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44), along with accompanying Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Arleigh Burke (DDG 51).

The Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group (ARG), with embarked 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), returned to the Baltic Sea, August 2, to strengthen interoperability with key NATO allies and partners.

 
X. The Nordstream 2 AG wins 2 court cases

12 July 2022 - The Court declares the action brought by Nord Stream 2 AG against the directive extending certain rules of the internal market in natural gas to pipelines from third countries to be partially admissible 

8 September 2022 - Swiss court gives Nord Stream 2 more time to avoid insolvency. 

In May, the court granted a provisional moratorium against bankruptcy proceedings for the first time, which was valid until September. Now it is extended by half year.

[M: these 2 won cases are important for Nordstream 2 AG to go online. Someone had to be quite unhappy as the only left was the military solution to blow NS1 and NS2 apart OR the LONG TERM delivery deals would be shortly in place.]

[M: So from 08/09/2022 the only thing protecting flow through the NS2 was the Merkel/Scholz deal. The NS2 most likely challenged "unbundling" issue on lower court as well. German public was already demanding reopening pipelines. Someone whose own energy strategy, political aims, and other objectives now seen a window of opportunity shrinking. Only possibility to take out NS2 was a military action.]

XI. Kaersarge detects a submarine 

1,2,3 Sept 2022 - US Military Helicopters Circled Around Future Nord Stream Leaks For Hours In September

In particular, at the beginning of the month, a US Navy Sikorsky MH-60R Seahawk helicopter loitered over the location of pipelines in the Baltic Sea near Bornholm for three days in a row on September 1, 2 and 3

[M: Note that helicopters are excellent for ASW,
Anti-Submarine-Warfare, they stay at place,
they can drop sonar or sonar-buoy and transmit data]

[M: Looks like a chase but there was no boat there]

[M: Again, ASW capability.
Helicopters are better than planes due to lower speed for anti-sub warfare]

FlightRadar shows a few flights there on that day

[M: There were several flight and several investigations, was this just a drill?]


[M: The post of the blogger is interesting. How so no Russian sub was announced?
US was conducting anti-submarine mission which has not been a drill.]
[Could it be that a UK submarine was discovered here?]

It is curious that on September 2, almost in parallel with the US military, a military helicopter NH90 of the Dutch Navy was flying in the vicinity of Bornholm Island, probably observing the activities of the Americans....



US helicopters, according to Flightradar24, also flew over the branches of Russian gas pipelines on September 10 and September 19.

[Could it be that a UK submarine was tracked and followed here?]

In all cases, the trajectories of the US military speak of observation flights or loitering with other targets over a specific section of the water area. Helicopters that made sorties on the night of September 22-23 and 25-26 have especially confusing tracks.


[M: Perhaps there was a UK submarine in the vicinity and US Navy from Kaersarge was tracking its movements. This kind of excludes that it was a secret approved NATO operation, looks more like UK went rogue and USA has been on it, knew, monitored yet has not stopped it or did not understand intentions of the submarine - speculating on another post with How it maybe went - so far sequence is in few posts on twitter. Btw, the path looks like the helicopter dropped sonarbuoys, then cycles to transmit its data to Kaersarge]. 

2 Sept 2022 - helicopter call sign FFAB123 MH-60S from USS Kearsarge flew either along the route of Nord Stream-2 or generally between the points where the accident occurred.

12 Sept 2022 NAVSUP, mission partners sustain USS Kearsarge ARG readiness for Baltic Sea exercises


XII. The Northern Coasts EXERCISE 3 - 15 Sept 2022

Then it was announced: "On September 15-19 warships of Germany, France and Estonia are assembling in Klaipėda Seaport for international annual maneuvers Northern Coasts 2022 in the Baltic Sea."

The exercise was extended over the 26/09 event. WHY?

"Our allies expect a leadership role from us" mean that US said to its allies to take care of its pipelines after warning them?                             
              

"The Baltic Sea is of vital importance for the Alliance and is bordered by six NATO countries”, said NATO spokesperson Oana Lungescu. “Northern Coasts is now in its 13th year.'

The increased presence in the Baltic Sea has also had an impact on the Navy's annual autumn maneuvers: Northern Coasts lasted longer than usual this year at four weeks, from 29 August to 28 September. This provided an opportunity for more participation from Germany's Baltic Sea partners. 

"As a major resident, we have a natural focus in the Baltic Sea region," explains the Inspector of the Navy, Vice Admiral Jan-Christian Kaack. "Our allies expect a leadership role from us."                                                          
"There has been a significant shift in the projects of our ships, boats and aircraft from outside to the Baltic Sea," confirms frigate captain Ulrich F. from the MOCMaritime Operations Centre. And he adds: “This applies to both national and international units. However, exact figures, data and facts are classified.                                                                                                                                         
"...As much steel at sea as possible..."                                                       


TO DO:

XIV Russia is rushing to the place (data on Twitter - bookmarked, Michaels post)

XV The Liz Truss´s UN announcement on 23 September
 
21 Sept 2022 - UK Prime Minister Truss addresses the United Nations General Assembly (transcript here)

01:00 min: "...Geopolitics is entering a new era.."

06:00 min: "We are cutting off the toxic power and pipelines from authoritarian regimes and strengthening our energy resilience."

"We will ensure we cannot be coerced or harmed by the reckless actions of rogue actors abroad."

"The free world needs this economic strength and resilience to push back against authoritarian aggression and win this new era of strategic competition.

We must do this together."

We are fortifying our deep security alliances in Europe and beyond through NATO and the Joint Expeditionary Force.

08:30 min: "The UK is providing funding, using the might of the City of London and our security capabilities to provide better alternatives to those offered by malign regimes.
The resolute international response to Ukraine has shown how we can deliver decisive collective action. 
[M: Is this a public admission that UK will in 3 days blow Nordstream pipelines? A public announcement of interested for allies to later refer to - "we are transparent"?]

[M: What happened around this meeting is described in this post - US-UK special relationship" 




XVII. Kaersarge leaves Baltic SEA

Was it because of what happened in Washigton? 
21/09 after issues with UK-UA "special relationship - here?


17-18 Sept 2022 In Gdynia



19 Sept 2022 Leaves Gdynia


21 Sept 2022 In Gdynia




22 Sept 2022 -  #VVHG725 #AE4FE2 USN MH-60R Strike Hawk

 '
USS Kearsarge (LHD 3) Wasp-class amphibious assault ship,
USS Arlington (LPD 24) and
USS Gunston Hall (LSD 44) northbound in the Great Belt




Too many capabilities and features to list
but an advanced sonar system
seems appears to be what stands out.

Took off from USS Kearsarge off the coast of Sweden

The MH-60R Seahawk from the USS Kearsarge
is flying off the coast of the Kaliningrad Oblast



 23 Sept 2022 -  Anti-submarine warfare MH-60R from the nearby USS Kearsarge


23 Sept 2022 -  USS Kearsarge´s  MH-60R Seahawk 168146
active off the coast of #Kaliningrad.


24 Sept 2022 - 
US Navy MH-60R Sea Hawk VVHG725

Took off from Gdansk Lech Walesa Airport
instead of USS Kearsarge.
Anti-submarine warfare helo over
the Baltics off the coast of Kaliningrad.


24 Sept 2022 - No doubt "something" has the USN's interest- concern off Kaliningrad. 
Helo has been over that spot for 7 consecutive days.




24 Sept 2022 - Kearsarge Amphibious Ready Group transits Danish Strait (date - earlier transit)


XVIII. Protests in Lubin, GER on 25-09-2022

The mayors of the surrounding communities are in favour
of opening Nord Stream 2, dated on 05-09-2022

On 23.09. Residents of various districts of Berlin saw a small plane in the sky pulling a banner with the inscription "Start Nord Stream 2 now".

One day before on 25-09-2022 German public demands reopening of pipelines:

Action was held in Germany in support of the launch of the Nord Stream 2
According to police, 3,500 people gathered in Lubmin near Greifswald on Sunday afternoon to demonstrate against the energy policy of the federal government, demonstration.




26-09-2022 the attack on NS1 and NS2.


XIX. Statements of Austin vs statements of Blinken

According this post: "Who said it is a "Sabotage" first?" US state secretary Anthony Blinken was "shaping" the narrative and definition of the case as a "sabotage" while US defence minister Lloyd Austin was unaware of the case and did not try to define, explaining that communication with allies continues.

[M: Kind of odd behaviour to look unprepared would US be behind the affair] 


SUMMARY:

* The data I collected do not show USA/Biden involvement, rather the opposite

* The US waring to Nordstream shareholders seemed genuine It is likely that the German orthern shored exercise extension and locations may have been result of the warning.

* The USA, Russia, Sweden and Denmark all detected submarine at some points of time

 ,... and it was not Russian as all were accounted for, and the one Kilo Class they have in Baltics does not have the i/o underwater capability. 

So Whose was it?

On 28-09-2022 CNN reports that:


"Russian submarines were also observed not far from those areas last week, one of the intelligence officials said... US officials declined to comment on the intelligence about the ships on Wednesday."

5 Oct 2022 - US considering offering to analyse underwater audio recordings to aid Nord Stream pipeline sabotage investigations

The US Navy’s processing of the sonar signatures – the term for the unique underwater sounds – provided by Sweden and Denmark could boost the investigations by providing a more detailed picture of what was in the area at the time of the pipeline explosions and what caused them, sources said... 

Each type of underwater machinery like submarines, torpedoes and vessel engines makes a unique sound that is called a “sonar signature,” and the US has an extensive library of these sounds.

CONCLUSION:

* THE UK IS A PRIME SUSPECT, NOT USA:


***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)

Friday, May 5, 2023

049 - Two crimes in Nordstream Affair case - Preliminary investigation results

The Nordstream Affair

(is now with high degree of confidence concluded)

MY PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION RESULTS

 
It is a very complex case

An international Scandal with Top Politicians involved

See collection of circumstantial evidence in chronological order.


Does Mortymer´s hyphotesis explain what happened? 

Lets explore:


1. There is a crime of the planning and physical executions.
  • This set of publicly available data shows the UK is the main suspect.          
  • The attack on Nordstream was long planned and multifaceted.

  • It involved many advanced preparation of the country to the outcome. 

  • The UK was expecting to ride a storm and prepared itself for it...      

The UK has been the most vocal ever since the project of Nordstream AG started which increased later when Nordstream 2 was suggested and construction started.

During the Novichok poisoning affair in 2020 the UK was pushing Germany to cancel the Nordstream project, demanded a split from Russian hydrocarbons; (I care not if that was a false or real affair, the fact is it was used politically against the Nordstream project).

After Brexit the UK lost the possibility to block the project from within the EU, legally and administratively. In Summer 2022 Nordstream won two major legal cases and could, after sanctions would be loosened, go online.

Nordstream was a security issue for the UK. There were several other motives involved there, like e.g. global politics, or economical,...

The only option left was a physical destruction... 

and then... 

2. There is a crime of a knowing about the attack and not stopping it and a crime of the following cover-up

This research shows the sequence of events in which several top (US, EU) politicians were aware of the attack few days before it happened. 

The sequence of events shows that US, EU learned about the plan on 20-21st of September. Many ad-hoc meetings between EU-US-UK were held about Energy security to provide enough deliveries. 

The next phase of the cover-up includes also the follow-up meeting in which some kind of joint agreement about the cover-up which was agreed in Prague on a summit by EU heads.



...this conclusion is what the data I have collected,

...all from public official sources, show in cross-referenced way.

 

  • Is this conclusion correct? -> Investigators must confirm, until then the UK is a "prime suspect". 
  • For me, based on data, the UK is the "state actor" behind the affair.


    The crime sequence reconstruction requires vast data and thorough testing.
    Alternative hypothesis must be formed and properly tested.
    Alternative explanations must be tested.
    Validations needed.

    ...it will be a long investigation.


***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)

Tuesday, May 2, 2023

048 - 101 questions about Nordstream affair journalists should be asking but are not

PREFACE/ISSUE

IF YOU ARE AN INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST, 

    THIS POST IS ESPECIALLY MEANT FOR YOU,

        IT IS AN APPEAL TO YOU TO ASK SERIOUS QUESTIONS:


These several set of questions I have explored in last 7 months, spent on it hundreds of hours. Links lead to (my) answers or official news, they describe more about the issue. 

No journalists seem to be "investigating", the topic is "t-o-x-i-c".



It is in the public interest to learn about the affair...

Journalist could do simple Criminal Profiling, and create hypothesis. 

The state actor had to have serious several objectives and motives, economical, political, security, foreign trade, trade balance, a complex issue of dependencies. Which main goal the cold calculation fulfilled?

I followed similar steps as during normal criminal procedures.

It is necessary to ask right questions about the affair so the crime is solved. Do explore, ask!


THE STATE ACTOR

#1 - The group of suspects is very limited.

Why has nobody created a list, a pool of possible suspects? Why did nobody try to explain each one motives and alibi so readers could compare?

 #2 - Who are the decision-makers, job roles behind, of the "state actor"?

Why has nobody created a list of Prime ministers, foreign, interior ministers, defence ministers, state heads? One of these is the "state actor".


INVESTIGATION RELATED

#3 - There are independent investigations in DK + SWE = that is OK.
The damage happened in their EEZs (Exclusive Economic Zones). 
Why is there investigation in Germany but not in France and Netherlands whose companies are also shareholders of NS1?

SWITZERLAND

#4 - There are investigations in DK + SWE = that is OK.

Both Nordstream AG and Nordstream 2 AG are incorporated in Switzerland. Why is Switzerland not involved in investigation about damages to its companies? Whey is there no investigation in Switzerland?

#5 - There was an attempt for UN investigation, and EU investigation.

The Swiss delegation did not arrive to the UN meeting despite two companies (Nordstream AG and Nordstream 2 AG) are incorporated there. Why? It was an attack against Swiss companies. Why is Switzerland playing ostrich politics? Could it be that the saboteur exploited some legal loop-hole which would mean an exodus of SUI incorporated companies as many international companies choose Swiss neutral grounds?

Also, is it possible that there is no EU level and/or international investigation into Nordstream affair as it could mean more victims are considered and That could change the direction of the investigation, who is victim, like European tax-payers, European energy utility companies and traders?

LEGAL

#6 - What is the definition of the affair? Whey are West and Russian different?

Is it a sabotage, grand sabotage, act of terrorism, act of aggression, an armed attack or a war crime?

#7 - Why was only Ukraine and Russia proposed "act of terrorism"?

Why was EU leadership spearheading that it was the act of sabotage?

What was the basis on which this has been decided and how could one even define such act without knowing the actor and the victim? 

#8 - Who is the (real) victim of the Nordstream affair? Russia or EU citizens?

Whom against was the act executed? Why? To limit Russian income, to lower European competitiveness? Who are actually ALL those victims? Who is collateral damage? How could European leaders evaluate that it was a "sabotage" so early without knowing all of this and more? Did they speak with a saboteur who explained them? Who provided legal advise?

#9 - Did Swiss court decision on 8th of September mean anything?

Could it be it triggered blowing Nordstream pipelines? Before that EU highest court decision about "decoupling" was in favour of Nordstream 2. Would it be possible that Nordstream could move its HQ back to Russia and be untouchable? Could someone ask if someone tried to stop this result? 

INSURANCE

#10 - Have sanctions against Nordstream Insurers created Catch-22 situation?

#11 - Did sanctions had any reverse unintended impact on European energy security and geopolitical stability?

#12 - Has the state actor researched policies of insurance companies have toward Nord Stream 1 & 2 companies and warned them to withdrew

#13 - Was the UK The First to impose sanctions affecting NS insurance companies pushing them out of contracts? Or was it US, EU or together? No data yet.

SANCTIONS

#14 - Why is very little written about the 1.5 Trillion Margin Call on EU energy?

#15 - Why is nobody mentioning that the Act of Retorsion allows Russia..

... to legally stop all deliveries as a response to non-UN sanctions? 

#16 - Why were attempts To 'Renormalize' Relations With Russia curbed?

BREXIT RELATED

#17 - Going back in time. What "strategic interests" had UK when Novichok case happened?

Real or not, the case was used in pushing Germany to leave the Nordstream 2 project. Was there more in it? The UK seem to have long dislike to NS.

#18 - What role did Brexit play in the roots of Nordstream affair? 

The Brexit messed with UK energy security, political influence diminished, the UK was left out of European affairs. Could pushing Russian energy and business influence from European politics be a motive for the sabotage? 

Is it possible that after leaving EU the only avenue left to cancel Nordstream projects was their physical demolition? After Brexit UK could no more use administrative and legal steps to block Nordstream 2 from going online.

#19 - The UK leaving the common energy market has caused UK huge problems.

Leaving the coupling initiative is prohibitive to develop alternative energy as cheap Russian alternative is available. Is the Nordstream wind farms plans a possible motive to stop Russian cheap energy exports?

EARLY WARNINGS? 

#20 - Why is UK warning and preparing against future energy hikes and a storm?

#21 - Why did UK warn Germany in January 2022 against its connection to RU?

Namely Liz Truss gave ultimatum to Germany: "..we cannot have a situation in which Russian aggression is rewarded in any way.."

 #22 - Why did UK tried to block normalization relations with Russia? 

RUSSIAN MOTIVES?

#23 - Is there actually a sane Russian motive? I have not found a one (yet).

My investigation has not found a single motive, economical, political, legal or else which could benefit somehow Russian state. Is there a RU motive? 

#24 - Why would Russia, Nordstream AG, Nordstream 2 AG fight legal battles?

In Summer EU highest court sided with Gazprom in case about "unbundling" separation of exporter and pipeline operator. On 8th of September the Nordstream 2 AG won a court in Switzerland to extend Out-of-Bankruptcy for next 1/2year. Why to blow pipelines then? Why not to let NS 2 AG just fail?

#25 - Why is Russia not blaming Ukraine?

Ukraine attempted two attacks to Russian other pipelines. Nobody mentioned them in connection with the Andromeda story. It would be a very obvious story line, they could even plant some Ukrainian tech or mines which they have in storage. Yet Russia blamed only the UK and asked USA to explain what has Seymour Hersh supposedly exposed. 

USA non-MOTIVES & possible alibi

#26 - The USA was strongly against EU being over-reliant on Russia.

The USA has understood that Germany needed some Russian natural gas yet they have never openly demanded closure of Nordstream 1 pipelines, but UK did. The USA only demanded that Germany keeps its deal Angela Merkel made that "The Nordstream 2 will not go online if Russia attacks Ukraine".

Germany has kept is part of the deal. Later Scholz confirmed in a call with V. Putin that this is still the case. US seemed to be happy, why to destroy both pipelines then Nordstream 1 and Nordstream2?

Would USA really break the deal attacking NS1 pipelines needed for Germany´s energy security? Why would USA not first ask Germany officially as they did with Nordstream 1? 

#27 - Did the USA learn about the event on 20-21th of September?

Did USA gave another warning to Germany and allies as many ships were on the sea tracing pipeline in pattern which looks like looking for a submarine?

#28 - Why did UK change its top security team on 23rd of September?

It is the same day the when Sulivan and Timmerman meeting happened, the same day US Navy assets left Baltic Sea. Are these events related? Could it really be that USA has learned that UK has installed successfully explosives and the next sequence of events was "irreversible"?

UK NAVY ASSETS RELATED 

#29 - Did helicopters with Anti Submarine warfare capability found something?

It looks like a submarine was spotted in Baltics in early September.

#30 - What were doing UK Royal navy Astute class submarines in September?

Namely S-120 Ambush and S-122 Audacious, the first one returned to Faslane/Clyde home naval base in early October the other had a special pre-mission cleaning in Crete in early September. Was Chalfont bay mounted? It would be the best for the missing and one sub seem to had something removed just after it returned to the bay a few days after the event.  

#31 - The US Navy offered processing of the sonar signatures in early October. 

Why? Is there any result? What data Sweden and/or Denmark have? Where was it taken? Is it possible that Denmark has a sonar signature of a submarine which passed somehow unnoticed through the Danish straights?

NATO & Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) & Northwoods HQs

#32 - Why nobody mentions that NATO has failed to protect the Nordstream?

#33 - Was the Nordstream affair part of the Global Britain strategy? 

What was the role of UK led Joint Expeditionary Force (JEF) in the Nordstream affair?

#34 - NATO & Nordstream. How could NATO sharing lots of data not know?

It is impossible to conduct a naval sabotage type operation against Nordstream pipelines without  3 naval HQs in Northwoods, London knowing about it?

 ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES

#35 - Environmental damage to Denmark and Sweden seems to be ignored.

Why? If West tried to find reasons to framing Russia as a terrorist state along UN definition, then it could help to confiscate Russian frozen assets. This could also help to impose Naval Blockade against Russia. Why is West not pursuing this venue? 

#36 - Why are environmental organizations not demanding court case? (No data)

USA RELATED

#37 - Whom did the USA send the June strategic warning?

It was about a future threat to Nordstream pipelines. We know Germany and allies were warned, which allies? Is it possible that shareholders of Nordstream all knew about the threat? Does this mean that also Russia through its share in Gazprom learned about this threat already in June? 

#38 - The USS Kaersarge at BALTOPS was unlikely planting anything.

There was a yearly internal/external check-up of pipelines, this could expose any mingling with pipelines and/or expose planted explosives. Is it even possible to plant during check-up? Kaersarge returned later to Baltic Sea and its path is visible.  

#39 - What happened on on 20th and 21st of September meetings?

Until 20th before Cleverly-Sulivan, Truss-Sulivan, and Truss-Biden meeting the UK-USA "special relationship" was rather unshackled, something happened during these two days. Could that be related to US finding out about UK planting explosives on Nordstream pipelines? 

#40 - Did US navy leave Baltic Sea on 23rd of September and ended its forward 

projection presence after learning that UK mined Nordstream pipelines? The Kaersarge was not in Baltics yet it was sending there intel planes and helicopters what looks like to see Russian response to have own data in case things get out of the hand. Is this version possible? 

 LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION

#41 - Why is nobody reporting about Bornholm deep which is the deepest?

The Bornholm Deep basin is the deepest area in the whole Baltic Sea, it is ideal for submarine operation yet nobody is examining which countries could have sent there submarine to execute underwater operation, why? 

#42 - Why nobody mentions the shipping lane traffic and Baltic cod fisheries? 

The northern spot is near frequented shipping lines so there could be a danger of being spotted if the planting happened from a surface boat.

#43 - What would be the importance of Christiansø Island if a sub was used?

Would a rescue team for divers on some sail-boat be a good backup B-plan if the planting was done from submarine which could be disturbed? Could a sailboat be a backup to pickup divers if the mother sub needed to leave?

#44 - There is ships movements data which many new spin theories ignore.  

#45 - Did RU radars from RU enclave in Kaliningrad seen anything?

The location of the attack is furthest from Kaliningrad and closest to the exist from the Baltic Sea. It gives to the attacker advantage to execute planting and escape easier than in other areas.

#46 - Was the proximity to the Danish Territorial Zone (TZ) relevant?

If the attacks was concluded by the submarine then the sub could hide in the Danish territorial zone which Russian naval forces and planes could not enter. It is possible that in such case only a small mini-submarine or similar "last mile delivery" submersible was used. Russia can not patrol in DK TZ. 

#47 - The Denmark said in spring it has a blind spot under the surface.

The Denmark admitted that they could not monitor what is going under in their Territorial waters. The Russia has several times entered the DK TZ, latest in June after the Baltops exercise. Was was the reason?

THE DEMOLITION TEAM

#48 - USA and UK demolitions teams had long training in February 2022.

On 8 Feb 2022 - EXU-1, FBI Host Maritime Post-Blast Investigation Course at NAS Key West. What were they discussing? What were they training for?

#49 - The Nordstram was a military naval act executed by a state actor.

The largest Naval force in Europe is the UK. Was this capability used?

#50 - Boris Johnson and Liz Truss made several visits to UK naval bases in 2022. 

Which units did they met there? How often? Did they, by any chance, visit Special Boat Services team which was accused by Russia?  

#51 - Russia officially accused UK Special Boat Services for Nordstream hit.

How so that a few days after the announcement UK parliamentary investigation was blocked by UK navy?  

UK NORDSTREAM RELATED STATEMENTS 

#52 - Why is nobody mentioning the long list of UK officials statements?

The UK and its officials were the biggest opponents of the Nordtsream 1 project and lost most influence, their energy exports became less competitive vis-a-vis Russian cheaper piped natural gas.

#53 - Was UK preparing to protect its economy and companies in advance

#54 - Was UK openly giving advance warning about attacking Nordstream? 

#55 - Why was Liz Truss missing over the critical period from Friday 23rd?

Is it possible that due to the threat of Russia finding out and/or the plot of being exposed she would be in danger? She was missing after the disastrous mini-budget for several days.

#56 - Was the April´s invitation to the UK-GER meeting from London? 

The topic discussed was how too wean Europe from Russian energy.

#57 - Boris Johnson´s 2021 statement "Stop guzzling Russian gas" ...

...and many others through years were against all Russian energy. He was the biggest voice against Russian Gas. Did this consistency and perhaps European unwillingness lead to decision to change words into actions? 

#58 - Was the UK giving a pre warning after plans to attack were ready?

"We hope that our friends may recognise that a choice is shortly coming between mainlining ever more Russian hydrocarbons in giant new pipelines and sticking up for Ukraine and championing the cause of peace and stability, let me put it that way."

#59 - Even before the war UK, Boris Johnson was demanding that Europe change

Johnson says this "must include" ending reliance on Russian oil and gas - hails Germany's suspension of Nord Stream 2. 

LIZ TRUSS STRANGE STATEMENTS

#60 - IN December 2021 Liz Truss made statement, but was it followed up? 

“The EU (European Union) relies on Russia for over 40% of its gas, and with some countries Russia has a complete monopoly of supply. If Russia gets its way, Europe will be increasingly hooked on its gas,” Truss told the Chatham House think tank. and later We have to end this strategic dependency

#61 - Why is in UK´s "EU energy security: Implications for the UK" this:

"...there is insufficient LNG import capacity within the EU, but spare capacity in the UK as well as capacity on the pipelines from the UK to mainland Europe..." Did UK try to blow pipeline to become energy hub for US LNG shipments to EU?

#62 - In March 2022 the UK has proclaimed a strong message:

"Diplomatically, politically, economically – and eventually, militarily Putin must fail in his invasion of Ukraine."

#63 - In April 2022 the UK identified Russia as their largest threat.

And Liz Truss stated that "we are ready to try and beat global aggressors at their own game". The UK was studying the Russian income and stated that "They could go further still – with a ban on imports of oil and gas; hydrocarbons make up a third of the Russian economy." 

Could this mean that UK tried to de

#64 - Liz Truss wanted to remove West dependency on Russian hydrocarbons.

It was on 20th of September just a week before the 26th when it happened.

#65 - Why did Liz Truss say this

Quote: ‘I am confident that together we can ride out the storm.’

 LIZ TRUSS SUPER STRANGE STATEMENT AT UN

#66 - Why did Liz Truss say this at the UN meeting?

... just few days before it was blown up? Was she making official pre-meditated announcement which could help later to explain that the UK has been transparent about their actions?

Quote: "...We are cutting off the toxic power and pipelines from authoritarian regimes and strengthening our energy resilience...

 Was she trying to be a responsible actor and give advance warning to its biggest ally the USA? Truss topic was USA LNG energy deliveries to Europe. Was this to substitute with knowledge that the Nordstream would be taken out forewer? 

FRANCE


#67 -
 French company is a shareholder of the Nordstream AG.

France had a navy asset in the area in September. Was it guarding the Northern past of the pipeline with Finnish navy? Was the original CIA strategic warning against future threats to Nordstream from June meant for mis September?

#68 - Why was Liz Truss considering Marcon/France to be "friend or an enemy"? 

Was it really because of the mentioned official reason or could it be that UK was not sure about the French reaction if it blew Nordstream AG two pipelines? How interesting that during the Prague summit about the European energy the issue is suddenly settled. Settled cover-up?

 BELGIUM

#69 - Why did Belgium block export of nuclear defence tech to UK?

Could it be that the nuclear powered sub may is a prime suspect in the Nordstream attack?


DENMARK

#70- Why did Mette Frederiksen state this

"Metter Frederiksen "Things can happen that we have not had the imagination to imagine"

NORWAY

#71 - What would be Norwegian motives?

They actually wanted to reduce exports to Europe as their domestic market had some serious dislocations. Then they were already at max production.

#72 - Norway is part of NATO but does not have a nuclear deterrence itself.

In case there would be some speculation or evidence that Norway did it or made a major contribution to the Nordstream Affair then NATO article of defence would not be triggered and Russia would be able to retaliate in kind.

#73 - Norway started to protect their key infrastructure in EEZ after the attack. 

Was Norway worried that Russia would retaliate in kind? Their main customer is UK. The protection of NOR pipelines turned into UK-NOR coverage shortly after.

#74 - In spring 2023 Norway announced nationalization of its infrastructure. 

These outside the TZ in EEZ are more vulnerable and if the Nordstream precedent that it is just a "sabotage" if it is owned by a company then nationalization would mean that any attack against it would be considered armed attack against a state hence state ownership offers better protection. Why is nobody looking into why the act was defined as "sabotage"?

OIL COMPANIES

#75 - Which companies left Russia first? Which state pushed hardest? See here.

If a state actor plans in advance to attack energy infrastructure of Europe Would it not want to profit from it and position itself to protect own companies?

WARNINGS?

#76 - The UK government was very vocal about the future spike of energy prices.

Is it possible that it was warning its companies and citizens about what is going to happen?

 

WAS MILITARY AND NAVY READY?

#78 - The Uk was leading the JEF forces and were on alert around 26th. Why?

#79 - How much did Zelenski know about the future blow on 4th of September?

He stated that: "Russia is preparing a "decisive blow" against European states in the field of energy"

UK MOTIVES & similar

#80 - Would UK foreign policy suffice to be a reason to blow Nordstream?

#81 - The UK succeeded in in becoming net energy exporter. Did it warn itc companies that a change is coming in energy markets?

#82 -

#83 -

#84 -

#85 - Why has nobody looked into UK´s underwater demolition capability yet?

#86 - If the Royal Navy HMS S-120 Ambush was used then...

... what is the chain of command

#87 - 

#88 - After Brexit the UK was facing energy insecurity.

Cutting off the Russian energy has enabled it to swing after 44 years back into net energy exporter. Without high energy price and removal of a competition of natural gas the UK alt. energy would be not sellable.    

#89 -

COVER UP

#90 - Did Ursula von der Leyen and Charles Michel knew about who has done it?

Why did Ursula met with Jens Stoltenberg on the day of the event and why did he requested the meeting just three days on 23rd of September?

#91 - The meeting on 23rd of September just 3 days before the event?

It was between Sulivan and Timmerman about US energy security and helping if there would be a need in short term. Was this about letting the sabotage to happen?

#92 - Was it Ursula von der Leyen and Charles Michel first defining the affair?

They both defined it as a sabotage, on what basis? Is it possible that they knew back then about who has done it because it is very difficult without knowing who and why to legally define the event as "sabotage"?

#93 - Were there disagreements in EU about handling the case?

Joseph Borrell was insisting that it is a "deliberate act" still on 28th.

#94 - Was the Prague informal summit of European heads of state related?

Was it informal as there is no legal need to write what was discussed there? Could this be a plain cover-up of the saboteur? The UK, which is a main suspect was present. There were many meetings with the UK representatives happened behind closed doors.

#95 - 

COVER UP

...it is 1 AM TO CONTINUE SOON... SO MUCH UNCOVERED YET SO MUCH TO PRESENT TO WORLD. 

THERE IS A LOT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL, DOCUMENTARY, ONLINE, VIDEO, CHARACTER, HISTORICAL AND OTHER TYPES OF EVIDENCE - ALL FROM VERIFIABLE PUBLIC OFFICIAL SOURCES, MOST BY STATE ACTORS, GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS... PLEASE HELP IN THE INVESTIGATION BY ASKING QUESTIOS! I MAY BE WRONG, I MAY BE RIGHT SOME 0%-99.9% BUT WITHOUT INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALIST THE PUBLIC IS KEPT IN THE DARK. PLEASE HELP. WRITE, INVESIGATE, ASK POLITICIANS WHAT HAPPENED, DEMAND ANSWERS.

...few more days... this post takes longer,... will continue on other posts and return,... 

#96 - 

#97 - 

#98 - 

#99 - 

#100 - Is there enough evidence for considering the UK was involved?

         ....or do you see some other possible explanation of events I documented?


THE LAST QUESTION:


#101 - Will you PLESE write about the case? 


 I do not need you to believe what I concluded,

 I want you to be curious,

do read those all public official sources I found,

do check data, verify and investigate... 


***

This investigation will try to find answers or explanations to those and other questions.

*** 

RELATED POSTS:


***

***
Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.
I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

(retweet and follow)