062 - Which suspects have already resigned?

In February 2022, I made a list of suspects,

government officials involved in the Nordstream affair:

 

I divided them into two groups.

1. British government officials who are suspected of planning, preparation, execution. Government, security and military subgroups.

2. Non UK officials who are responsible of covering up

 

Later I filed several legal criminal cases.

Note: List is being updated with new resignations, includes prediction.

 

Suspects OF NORDSTREAM AFFAIR

GROUP 1 - UK OFFICIALS

• Liz Truss - Resigned on 20 Oct 2022 as Prime Minister
  
  
• Suella Brawemen  - forced to resign as UK home secretary 19 Oct 2022
  
  
• Alec Shellbrooke - Resigned on 26 Oct 2022 as Def. min. for logistics
  
  
• Boris Johnson - Resigned on 10 June 2023 from Parliament
  
  
• Antony David (Tony) Radakin - Resigned on 23 June 2023 as Head of British army
  
  
• Ben Wallace - Resigned on 31 Aug 2023 as Defence Secretary
  
  
• James Heappey - Replaces and reappointed
  
  
• Penny Mordaunt - Pressed to quit a race
  
  
• James Cleverly - not resigned yet, replaced S. Brawemen on 19/10/2022
  
  
• Members of the SBS DTXG team - unknown
  
  
• Possibly also these as they were part of UK security under Truss. 

These people were put into office on 23rd of September and could have been involved in the case and/or could have been at least briefed at some point. 

 

Foreign Policy and Security Council (FPSC)

 dissolved by Rishi Sunak on 1st on November 2022, members:

• Jacob Rees-Mogg - FPSC dissolved, Resigned from the frontbench on 25 October 2022 (did he delete his posts??? - note his Norway deals on 30-08-2022 in preparation to the Nordstream mission)
  

• Keith Blount - FPSC dissolved
  
  
• Edward Ahlgreen - FPSC dissolved
  
  
• Tom Tugendhat - FPSC dissolved -  Minister of State for Security. 
  
  
• Victoria Prentis - FPSC dissolved
  
  
• Oliver Dowden - FPSC dissolved
  
  

Nuclear Deterrence and Security Sub-Committee  (NDSSC)

• Dominic Raab - Resigned on 21 April 2023 (bullying case)
  
  
• Grant Shapps - Replaces Ben Wallace on 31 August 2023

• Rishi Sunak - Became the UK Prime Minister after Liz Truss on 20 Oct 2022
  
  
• Jeremy Hunt - Appointed 14 Oct 2022 to Chancellor of the Exchequer
  
  
• Nadhim Zahawi - FPSC dissolved
  
  
  Other suspects in UK
  
  
• Patrick Sanders - Chief of general Stuff (June 2022 - ...)
  
  
• Gwyn Jenkins -Vice-Chief of the Defence Staff (Vice-Chair)
  
  
• Awarded in Oct 2023 - here

GROUP 2 - Non-UK OFFICIALS

• Oleksiy Reznikov - Ukrainian Defence minister, 6 Sept 2023 


• Jens Stoltenberg - not yet
  
  
• Ursula von der Leyen - not yet
  
  
• Charles Michel - not yet
  
  
• Frans Timmermans - not yet, see see, see, see, see
  
  
• Joseph Borell - not yet
  
  
• Blinkein - US, not yet
  
  
• Biden  - US, not yet

In time I will add more - the pool is big, these as well: EU officials.

RELATED POSTS:

***

- INDEX -

***

Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.

I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

mortymer001

(retweet and follow)

061 - One pager summary of the Mortymer´s Nordstream hypothesis

The one pager 

 

Nordstream affair Summary

 

Dear reader,

This blog is a private, detailed, and independent in-depth investigation into the Nord Stream affair.

The investigation aims to delve into the incident's origins, motives, methods, and political game surrounding the affair. It emphasizes the use of legally obtained public domain data.

The style offers readers to form independently their own opinions about what happened and why.

The blog posts focus on the chronology of official statements, explores Nord Stream incident from different points of view in several timelines and explores definitions, and events related to sanctions.

The investigation involves analysing evidence, including the possibility of involvement by various governments and parties, such as Russia, the United States or Ukraine.

It also explores political involvement of other countries such as Switzerland, Norway, Denmark, or Belgium.

Using best practices of criminal profiling it identifies the UK government as the prime suspect of the Nordstream affair based on different types of evidence. It eliminates other possible perpetrators through careful crosscheck of available data.

After identifying the UK government as the main suspect the blog looks at evidence of UK conducting preparations to the event, warnings, changing its security structures or it looks into the Nordstream related statements and events in UK under Boris Johnson and Liz Truss and looks at the post Brexit Britain in relation to Russian energy exports.

The investigation raises questions about the attack on the Nord Stream energy infrastructure and explores possible primary, secondary and other motives or legal aspects the UK could have to target the EU's key energy infrastructure. Was it a false flag? Were there more attacks planned? What was the role of JEF?

It seeks to shed light on the legal definitions and severity of the attack and the geopolitical context.

It also explores shaping of the narrative that it was the “sabotage” and not a “terrorist act”. The author describes based on small indices the possible coverup of inconvenient truth by EU governments on the unofficial Prague summit  shortly after the event happened and how the UK possibly appeased other states like France not to disclose who was the perpetrator. It extrapolates how several top individuals could have known about the impending attack but have not for political or other reasons acted on such information.

The blog highlights the significance of impartial and professional inquiries to establish facts and accountability regarding the sabotage. It explores other hypothesis such as Hersh´s claim about BALTOPS and possibly debunks it here, here and here.

The blog author stresses the importance of uncovering the truth and ensuring accountability. As a result of his work several criminal investigations were submitted. He reflects on the news released by Swedish prosecutor.                                                                                             

Version 1.

A picture version:

Preliminary done.

Hypothesis testing and verification launching now...

RELATED POSTS:

080 - Who hasn't heard of Mortymer's Nordstream hypothesis yet?

***

- INDEX -

***

Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.

I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

mortymer001

(retweet and follow)

060 - Open letter to journalists

Dear journalists,
It's been another busy week

for all of you who cover this affair...

...it is not just a crime, it is a very big scandal.
A moment in European history which changes the future.

There is a lots of data I have collected, some of it looks like a key evidence.

Publish and you should put a pressure to answer questions

about things I have found out about the crimes of Nordstream affair.

Dear ...... [journalists],

I am the author of the self funded independent investigation reported on a blog I created for that case: https://nordstreambymortymer.blogspot.com/ 

I tried to contact you on Twitter/X but got no response so far.

Attached I am sending you a sample of data I collected. These could be considered leads, a circumstantial evidence, some of them even pointing to direct evidence, some could be even considered a "smoking gun" if someone digs further, and confirms suspicious behaviour.

While most investigative journalists searched the blast location I started to probe and investigate governments as it was clear one of them has signed the mission to take out the our #1 key energy infrastructure. I am not a reporter so I ask you for a help to validate, research, examine further and bring the focus of public into questioning also other less known aspects of the multifaceted crime. I built the case on context and inferences following best investigative practices, I used criminal profiling, other standard tools and techniques - here is a short summary.

Here I tried to summarize unanswered questions which journalists should be asking but are not.

I am aware that my blog is hard to read, it contains a lot of data which is analysed, categorized, sorted. It follows my progress in investigation so topics are mixed. It may be difficult to go through as it is so massive. I made it for the investigation, not to get followers or because I desire to be famous.

Just to be clear, I am NOT proposing some conspiracy theory here. I am presenting you a well founded fact based hypothesis that nobody else but a small group within the UK government and military was behind: Truss, Johnson, Cleverly, Radakin, Wallace and few others. Events and statements, dataset I collected hint to a sequence that some from this group have decided already in January/February 2022 that if Russia enters in war with Ukraine, the conflict will enable an attack on the Nordstream pipelines which are considered by the UK a strategic threat to their security. If the UK was the perpetrator then the main responsibility lies on the head of UK military which is Liz Truss. Here is data about her and Nordstream. It is a subset of another larger post about Britain´s politicians vs Nordstream - here. Please look at the UK´s energy and security policy papers as they changed through 2022. Note also that shortly after the attack the UK became, after 44 years, net energy exporter. The UK after Brexit had to leave the  EU internal energy market which was a disaster for its competitiveness. The UK needed higher oil prices to activate alternative energy sources and open North Sea (this is from UK energy security), their companies left Russia among first. There are other motives, objectives which I explored as well, for example the Global Britain policy. After Brexit the UK lost all possibilities, including legal how to stop Nordstream. The USA had the "Merkel-Biden" deal which was re-confirmed by Scholz later. 

The Russia as a suspect has been excluded in several rounds.

The USA has been also excluded from the perpetrators.

Norway could be ruled out as well. I made an overview here.

Seems France has been convinced not to disclose who has done it in Prague.

I read your article pointing to the Ukraine. Could there be some connection between UK and Ukraine?

Of course, see here. The legal liability is not valid in two cases: Self-sabotage and Armed conflict.

It is possible that the execution itself, the last stage of the mission, has been done by individuals belonging to other nation.

But that is up to investigators, they are the small fish, they are not the "government officials" who bear the responsibility, they followed orders.

Anyone can extrapolate about who will pay the insurance based on who is found guilty. 

It could even be Germany and allies IF it is found out that they learned from the UK about it before it happened (Stoltenberg, Michel, Leyen, Blinken, Biden) but they have deliberately let the attack to happen - Negligence or Failure to act, Aiding and Abetting, Misconduct in public office, Obstruction of justice. Note that this case COULD bring general not personal responsibility on the whole EU. The case is a massive miscalculation, tragic mess which nobody wants to touch as there are many worms in this can.

I wish to stay anonymous as to protect my family.

I trust in your professionality, confidentiality and I believe you will not share this info further without my permission as truth could be dangerous.

Are you interested in the data I have collected?

Would you like to hear my take about the topic?

I have not signed rights with anyone yet.

Attachments - sample screenshots:

RELATED POSTS:

080 - Who hasn't heard of Mortymer's Nordstream hypothesis yet?

***

- INDEX -

***

Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.

I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

mortymer001

(retweet and follow)

059 - I filed several Criminal cases and investigations

Yes, the law is incredibly important in society. It serves as a framework of rules and regulations that govern behavior, maintain order, protect individual rights, and promote justice. To make human rights a reality, they have to be protected through laws. Nobody, not even Jens Stoltenberg, Leyen, Michel or Blinken and Biden can be above law... Nobody!

1. In Germany the right investigator I assumed was:
                                           "Federal Criminal Police Office"

The Federal Criminal Police Office is Germany’s central criminal investigation agency. It coordinates federal and state cooperation in police investigations. There is a link where to file cases:

 Page: Contact the public enquiry service

Hello,

Based on my private investigation and the public data I collected, sorted and analysed the UK is most likely behind the Nordstream affair:

https://nordstreambymortymer.blogspot.com/

My hypothesis states clearly that there are 2 crimes:

1. The actual act by a UK government who went rogue and planned, executed the mission.

2. The "cover-up" by top EU politicians 

- Few even learned about it a week before but did not stop the act

- EU top politicians decided jointly afterwards to keep the suspect secret for political reasons.

It is a mess, a scandal. Please investigate the circumstantial, video, audio, documentary, character, and other types of evidence I listed.

There is tons of supporting evidence on my blog made to report the investigation - timelines, public announcements, speeches, official energy, foreign, economic strategies, analysis, all show that the UK was actively preparing policies which would benefit UK after the attack on key European energy infrastructure. The set of data I collected show that the UK was behind the Nordstream affair.

If you need help let me know.

I may be wrong on several details, misunderstand other but the sheer set of collected data points directly to the UK government.

There are several findings which could potentially be "smoking guns" but I have no authority nor I am the one who should be confirming, investigating further. 

The truth is there, too many people know already anyway so I hope you will finally expose those criminals behind it. However painful the truth is there is no other way around but releasing what happened.

Best, 

-------

Proof, filed on 18-07-2023:

Update 02 August 2022 - The case can not be processed by FCPO, I got advise to contact to the investigator who handles the case (see #4).

2. The ICC - The International Criminal Court

I filed a criminal case against UK and Leyen, Michel and UK for this suspected crime - here, here

3. The EPPO - The independent public prosecution office of the EU

I filed a criminal case against Leyen and Michel for this suspected crime - here, here

Page: Report a crime      

4. The GER Attorney General at the Federal Court of Justice

The FCPO (1) answered me to contact directly the German criminal investigator handling the Nordstream case:

Der Generalbundesanwalt führt die Ermittlungen zur "Nordstream Affäre". ich bitte Sie, sich in Ihrer Angelegenheit an den Generalbundesanwalt zu wenden. Unter dem folgenden Link finden Sie die Kontaktdaten: link

[The Attorney General is investigating the "Nord Stream Affair". I ask you to contact the Federal Public Prosecutor General in your matter. You can find the contact details under the following link: here]

See Peter Frank 

-> And so I did filed a case here.

Federal Public Prosecutor General Peter Frank and Deputy Federal Public Prosecutor General Lars Otte. 

...so far no response from 2, 3, 4 other than that they received it.

Lets watch!

5. The GER Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) - General contact enquiry - here.

...

Should I file more reports to investigate?

What comes to my mind is:

5. In SWE? Whom to contact?

7. In DK? Whom to contact?

8. Does EU have some body to investigate? In past it was said that they leave local investigators which have the legal responsibility due to blows happened in DK, SWE territorial zones.  See here.

9. A case against corrupt EU top officials as each EU state top politicians now know yet they cover up? See here.

10. How to report against NATO?

Is there any lawyer who could help or advise? Any ideas?

Please leave comment or contact me on twitter.

DISCLOSURE:

ALL DATA IS LEGAL

THERE IS NOTHIS ON THIS INVESTIGATION WHICH HAS BEEN OBTAINED OR DONE ILLEGALLY

ANYONE WITH SKILL AND TIME COULD ALWAYS DO THE SAME

I FAMILIARIZED MYSELF WITH WHISTLEBLOWER RIGHTS JUST IN CASE

FREQUENT ONLINE OFFLINE BACKUPSA RE MADE

COPIES OF MY WORK ARE ON DIFFERENT CONTINENTS

DIFFERENT IPs WERE USED

UPÖLADS FROM DIFFERENT LOCATIONS

ONE NEVER KOWS

***

- INDEX -

***

Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.

I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

mortymer001

(retweet and follow)