035 - The (government size) elephant in the Nordstream affair room

PREFACE/ISSUE

There is a limited amount of suspects.

Who exactly was in power in each country at the moment of the crime?

How does Hercule Poirot solve crimes?

While some detectives scrabble around on the floor searching for clues, Poirot uses psychology and his extensive knowledge of human nature to weed out the criminals. He will of course take physical evidence into account, but more often than not his combination of order, method and his little grey cells does the trick.

[MRT: Standard practices used in criminal investigations were used 

for this early summary of possible suspects and their alibi/motives.] 

  "Let´s explore together the WHO, WHY a little bit. Shall we?"

 

I. It is quite clear that the Nordstream affair was done by a State Actor

This means that:

• Several government officials got together and cooked the plan - group.

[MRT: later explored  here: 052 - List of 17 states and their top officials who were considered suspects]  

• The head of any government / executive, is a Prime minister. 

• It was a military operation and so Head of military / Defence secretary was involved.

• It was a naval operation so Head of navy was involved.

• It is a country attacking assets of another country so Foreign minister / Foreign secretary was involved.

• To keep all secret Head of internal affairs / Security was involved.

• President or Royals are heads of different states, heads of military.  

 

II. The government of that particular state have to had clear objectives.

This means that:

• They had to have a plan which was done long in advance to think through the issue from many angles.  

[MRT: Later explored in these posts: 

163 - Nordstream affair - The planning begins,
159 - Nordstream affair - The Opening Act] 

• It was an attack on energy infrastructure. There country had to improve its own position with its own energy security.  

• Despite latest issues the Nordstream was bringing a lot of profit to Russia and was projected to bring more in future. The attack was meant to kill its export income.

• From political point of explanation to allies had to be done through foreign minister formal and informal meetings. There had to be tensions in relations with this country post the event.

 

II. The pool of suspects

There is just a bunch of state actors which are potential suspects:

• Russia
• Ukraine
• USA
• UK
• France
• Germany
• Netherland
• Poland
• Finland
• Denmark
• Norway
• Sweden
• Estonia
• Lithuania
• Latvia

Overview + alibi/motive

 

II. There are serious reasons about the WHO is MY prime suspect

Related posts:

UK has changed its security structures on 23-09-2022
UK government does not like Nordstream
100 shades of Nordstream sabotage - part I
100 shades of Nordstream sabotage - part II
100 shades of Nordstream sabotage - part III
Attempts To 'Renormalize' Relations With Russia were curbed
About The forgotten attack on Turk Stream and about UK Tackling Russian income from hydrocarbons
Mission accomplished - UK - from Energy Importer to Energy Exporter
About the UK-USA "special relationship"
The UK and French relationship around 26-09-2022
My Suspects of Nord Stream job

 

OTHER UK RELATED POSTS

most of the research about UK´s role, motives has been conducted in 2023

The summary is here:

121 - Hersh´s claim vs Hard data - and - Mortymer´s Nordstream hypothesis recap

***

- INDEX -

***

Uncovering the truth took over two years of self-funded, tireless investigation.

I decided to open it for free, no paywall, despite huge investment.
Because the truth matters.
Please consider supporting my work with a donation.

Every bit helps keep this mission alive!

mortymer001

(retweet and follow)