049 - The 2 crimes in Nordstream Affair case

The Nordstream Affair

(is now most likely solved)

?

 

It is a very complex case

An international Scandal with Top Politicians involved

See collection of circumstantial evidence in chronological order.

Does Mortymer´s hyphotesis explain what happened? 

Lets explore:

1. There is a crime of the planning and physical executions.

• This set of publicly available data shows the UK is the main suspect.          
• The attack on Nordstream was long planned and multifaceted.
  
  
• It involved many advanced preparation of the country to the outcome. 
  
  
• The UK was expecting to ride a storm and prepared itself for it...      

The UK has been the most vocal ever since the project of Nordstream AG started which increased later when Nordstream 2 was suggested and construction started.

During the Novichok poisoning affair in 2020 the UK was pushing Germany to cancel the Nordstream project, demanded a split from Russian hydrocarbons; (I care not if that was a false or real affair, the fact is it was used politically against the Nordstream project).

After Brexit the UK lost the possibility to block the project from within the EU, legally and administratively. In Summer 2022 Nordstream won two major legal cases and could, after sanctions would be loosened, go online.

Nordstream was a security issue for the UK. There were several other motives involved there, like e.g. global politics, or economical,...

The only option left was a physical destruction... 

and then... 

2. There is a crime of a knowing about the attack and not stopping it and a crime of the following cover-up

This research shows the sequence of events in which several top (US, EU) politicians were aware of the attack few days before it happened. 

The sequence of events shows that US, EU learned about the plan on 20-21st of September. Many ad-hoc meetings between EU-US-UK were held about Energy security to provide enough deliveries. 

The next phase of the cover-up includes also the follow-up meeting in which some kind of joint agreement about the cover-up which was agreed in Prague on a summit by EU heads.

...this conclusion is what the data I have collected,

...all from public official sources, show in cross-referenced way.

 

• Is this conclusion correct? -> Investigators must confirm, until then the UK is a "prime suspect". 

• For me, based on data, the UK is the "state actor" behind the affair.

***
Like it?


Here is the recommended reading list order


Follow me on twitter Mortymer001